Display again
SNCTP000003369 | EUCTR2017-004294-14 | BASEC2018-01619

Erhaltungsstudie #2 – Studie zur Bestimmung der Wirkung von oralem Ozanimod als Erhaltungstherapie, im Vergleich zu einem Placebo, bei Patienten mit mittelschweren bis schweren aktiven Morbus Crohn

Data source: BASEC (Imported from 07.05.2021), WHO (Imported from 18.04.2021)
Changed: 04.05.2021
Disease category: Digestive Systems diseases (non cancer)

Brief description of trial (Data source: BASEC)

In dieser Studie wird ein Vergleich zwischen Patienten, die Ozanimod erhalten, und Patienten, die ein Placebo (ein Scheinmedikament, das so aussieht wie das wirkstoffhaltige Prüfpräparat, aber keinen Wirkstoff enthält) erhalten, angestellt. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass das wirkstoffhaltige Prüfpräparat bzw. Placebo erhalten wird, beträgt jeweils 50%. Der Patient und der Prüfartz werden nicht wissen, welche Behandlung der Patient erhält. Die Patienten werden bis Woche 52 dieser Studie auf Krankheitsaktivität untersucht. Patienten, die in dieser Studie ein Rezidiv erleiden, und alle Patienten, die die Studie abschliessen, können an der Studie namens „RPC01-3204“ teilnehmen, in der alle Teilnehmer sicher sein werden, dass sie oral Ozanimod erhalten.
Ozanimod wurde von den zuständigen Behörden bisher noch nicht für die Behandlung von Morbus Crohn zugelassen. Die im Rahmen dieser Studie durchgeführte Behandlung mit Ozanimod wird noch erprobt.
An dieser Studie werden weltweit ca. 535 Patienten an ca. 485 Prüfzentren teilnehmen. In der Schweiz ist die Teilnahme von 16 Patienten geplant.

Health conditions investigated (Data source: BASEC)

Mittelschwerer bis schwerer aktiver Morbus Crohn

Health conditions (Data source: WHO)

Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease
MedDRA version: 20.0Level: PTClassification code 10011401Term: Crohn's diseaseSystem Organ Class: 10017947 - Gastrointestinal disorders;Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Digestive System Diseases [C06]

Rare disease (Data source: BASEC)

No

Intervention investigated (e.g. drug, therapy or campaign) (Data source: BASEC)

Die untersuchte Behandlung ist Ozanimod und wird über 48 Wochen einmal täglich oral eingenommen. Es wird mit einem Placebo verglichen (ein Scheinmedikament, das so aussieht wie das wirkstoffhaltige Prüfpräparat, aber keinen Wirkstoff enthält).
Die Studie umfasst 8 Besuche im Prüfzentrum. Die Besuche können jeweils 3–4 Stunden dauern.
In dieser Studie werden unter anderem Blut-, Gewebe- und Stuhlproben auf Biomarker untersucht. Bei Biomarkern handelt es sich um Substanzen wie Proteine (Eiweissstoffe), die Aufschluss darüber geben, wie das Medikament im Körper wirkt. Biomarkeruntersuchungen sind in dieser Studie obligatorisch.

Interventions (Data source: WHO)


Product Name: ozanimod
Product Code: RPC1063 (equivalent to ozanimod HCl)
Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule, hard
INN or Proposed INN: Ozanimod
Other descriptive name: OZANIMOD
Concentration unit: mg milligram(s)
Concentration type: equal
Concentration number: 1-
Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Capsule, hard
Route of administration of the placebo: Oral use

Product Name: ozanimod
Product Code: RPC1063 (equivalent to ozanimod HCl)
Pharmaceutical Form: Capsule, hard
INN or Proposed INN: Ozanimod
Other descriptive name: OZANIMOD
Concentration unit: mg milligram(s)
Concentration type: equal
Concentration number: 0.25-
Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Capsule, hard
Route of administration of the placebo: Oral use

Criteria for participation in trial (Data source: BASEC)

1. Erfüllen der Einschlusskriterien bei Einschluss in die Induktionsstudie (RPC01-3201) und Abschluss der Wirksamkeitsbeurteilungen in Woche 12 der Induktionsstudie
2. Männliches oder weibliches Geschlecht, Alter 18–75 Jahre (zum Zeitpunkt des Einschlusses)
3. Schriftliche Einwilligung nach Aufklärung vor der Durchführung jeglicher studienbezogenen Verfahren und Fähigkeit, den Ablaufplan zu befolgen
4. Bei Patientinnen im gebärfähigen Alter:
Bereitschaft, während der Studie bis zum Abschluss des Besuchs nach der 90-tägigen Sicherheitsnachbeobachtung eine sichere Empfängnisverhütungsmethode anzuwenden.

Exclusion criteria (Data source: BASEC)

1. Vorliegen irgendeiner klinisch relevanter Erkrankung der Leber, des Nervensystems, des Herzens oder der Lunge, des Auges, des Hormonsystems, psychiatrische Erkrankungen oder einer anderen bedeutenden systemischen Erkrankung, die die Teilnahme an der Studie negativ beeinflussen könnte
2. Bei Frauen: Schwangerschaft, Stillzeit oder positiver Schwangerschaftstest
3. Verdacht auf Vorliegen eines nicht angemessen behandelten Abszesses in der Bauchhöhle oder eines analen Abszesses
4. Operative Entfernung oder Teilentfernung des Dickdarms, Teilentfernung des Dünndarms oder Anlage eines künstlichen Darmausgangs
5. Aktive Krebserkrankung innerhalb von 5 Jahren
6. Impfung mit einem Lebendimpfstoff oder einem abgeschwächtem Lebendimpfstoff innerhalb von 4 Wochen vor der ersten Dosis des Prüfpräparats

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria (Data source: WHO)

Inclusion criteria:
Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
1. Subject fulfilled the inclusion criteria at time of entry into the Induction Study (RPC01-3201 or RPC01-3202) and have completed the Week 12 efficacy assessments of the Induction Study.
2. Subject must provide written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures and have the ability to comply with the Table of Events. For adolescent subjects, the parent/legal guardian of the adolescent must sign an informed consent form (ICF). In addition, adolescent subjects must also agree to participate in the study by signing an assent. A parent or guardian must be willing to supervise adherence to the protocol requirements. Adolescent subjects who reach the legal age of consent while participating in the study will be asked to sign an ICF themselves to acknowledge their willingness to continue in the study.
3. Subject is in clinical response (a reduction from baseline in CDAI of = 100 points or CDAI score of < 150 points) and/ or in clinical remission (CDAI score of < 150 points) and/or has an average daily stool frequency score = 3 and an average abdominal pain score = 1 with abdominal pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline at Week 12 of the Induction Study.
4. Female subjects of childbearing potential:
Note: For the purposes of this study, a female subject is considered to be of childbearing potential if she is = 12 years of age or has reached menarche, whichever occurred first, and 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy (the surgical removal of the uterus) or bilateral oophorectomy (the surgical removal of both ovaries) or 2) has not been postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (that is, has had menses at any time during the preceding 24 consecutive months).
Must agree to practice a highly effective method of contraception throughout the study until completion of the 90-day Safety Follow-Up Visit. Highly effective methods of contraception are those that alone or in combination result in a failure rate of a Pearl Index of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Acceptable methods of birth control in the study are the following:
? combined hormonal (containing oestrogen and progestogen) contraception, which may be oral, intravaginal, or transdermal
? progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation, which may be oral, injectable, or implantable
? placement of an intrauterine device (IUD)
? placement of an intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
? bilateral tubal occlusion
? vasectomised partner
? complete sexual abstinence
Periodic abstinence (calendar, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods), withdrawal (coitus interruptus), spermicides only, and lactational amenorrhoea method are not acceptable methods of contraception.
Counseling about pregnancy precautions and the potential risks of fetal exposure must be conducted for female subjects of childbearing potential. The Investigator will educate all FCBP about the different options of contraceptive methods or abstinence at Day 1, as appropriate.
The subject will be re-educated every time her contraceptive measures/methods or ability to become pregnant changes. The female subject's chosen form of contraception must be effective by the time the female subject is randomized into the study (for example, hormonal contraception should be initiated at least 28 days before randomization).
Are the trial subjects under 18? yes
Number of
Exclusion criteria:
Exclusions Related to General Health:
1. Subject has any clinically relevant cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, pulmonary severe respiratory disease [pulmonary fibrosis or COPD]) , ophthalmological, endocrine, psychiatric, or other major systemic
disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study difficult or that would put the subject at risk by participating in the
study.
2. Subject is pregnant, lactating, or has a positive urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) measured prior to randomization.
3. Subject has suspected or diagnosed intra-abdominal or perianal abscess that has not been appropriately treated.
4. Subject has undergone a colectomy (partial or total), small bowel resection, or an ostomy (ie, temporary colostomy, permanent colostomy,
ileostomy, or other enterostomy) since Day 1 of the Induction Studies or has developed symptomatic fistula (enterocutaneous or entero enteral).
5. Subject has had cancer within 5 years including solid tumors and hematological malignancies (except basal cell and in situ squamous cell
carcinomas of the skin or cervical dysplasia/cancer that have been excised and resolved); or colonic dysplasia that has not been completely
removed.
Exclusions Related to Medications:
6. Hypersensitivity to active ingredients or excipients of ozanimod or placebo
7. Subject has received any of the following therapies during the
Induction Study:
a. rectal steroid therapy (ie, steroids administered to the rectum or sigmoid via foam or enema)
b. post-baseline initiation of, or increase in, corticosteroids to treat worsening CD to a dose greater than the maximum daily dose taken between the screening and baseline visits
c. rectal 5- aminosalicylates (ASA) (ie, 5-ASA administered to the rectum)
d. parenteral corticosteroids
e. total parenteral nutrition therapy
f. antibiotics for the treatment of CD
g. immunomodulatory agents (6-MP, AZA, including but not limited to cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus)
h. immunomodulatory biologic agents as well as other treatments for CD such as etrasimod, filgotinib, and upadacitinib
i. investigational agents
j. apheresis
8. Subject has current or planned treatment with immunomodulatory agents (eg, AZA, 6-MP, or MTX) during the Maintenance Study.
9. Subject has chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use (note: occasional use of NSAIDs and acetaminophen [eg, headache, arthritis, myalgias, or menstrual cramps] and aspirin up to 325 mg/day is permitted).
10. Subject has received treatment with Class Ia or Class III antiarrhythmic drugs or treatment with 2 or more agents in combination known to prolong PR interval.
11. Subject has received a live or live attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to first dose of IP.
12. Subject has received previous treatment with lymphocyte-depleting therapies (eg, Campath™, anti-CD4, cladribine, rituximab, ocrelizumab, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, total body irradiation, bone marrow transplantation, alemtuzumab, or daclizumab).
13. Subject has received previous treatment with D-penicillamine, leflunomide or thalidomide.
14. Subject has received previous treatment with natalizumab, fingolimod, or other S1P modulators.
15. Subject has received previous treatment with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, or mycophenolate mofetil within 16 weeks of first dose of IP.
16. Subject has a history of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or

Further information on the trial in WHO primary registry

https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=eudract_number:2017-004294-14

Further information on the trial from WHO database (ICTRP)

http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=EUCTR2017-004294-14-LT

Further information on trial

Date trial registered

01.02.2018

Incorporation of the first participant

12.03.2018

Recruitment status

Authorised-recruitment may be ongoing or finished

Academic title (Data source: WHO)

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Oral Ozanimod as Maintenance Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease

Type of trial (Data source: WHO)

Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product

Design of the trial (Data source: WHO)

Controlled: yes
Randomised: yes
Open: no
Single blind: no
Double blind: yes
Parallel group: yes
Cross over: no
Other: no
If controlled, specify comparator, Other Medicinial Product: no
Placebo: yes
Other: no
Number of treatment arms in the trial: 2

Phase (Data source: WHO)

Human pharmacology (Phase I): noTherapeutic exploratory (Phase II): noTherapeutic confirmatory - (Phase III): yesTherapeutic use (Phase IV): no

Primary end point (Data source: WHO)

Main Objective: Demonstrate the efficacy of ozanimod compared to placebo on the maintenance of clinical remission and endoscopic response;Secondary Objective: - Demonstrate the efficacy of ozanimod compared to placebo on maintenance of clinical response
- Demonstrate the efficacy of ozanimod compared to placebo on maintenance of endoscopic remission and mucosal healing
- Demonstrate the efficacy of ozanimod, compared to placebo, in achieving corticosteroid-free remission
- Demonstrate the efficacy of ozanimod, compared to placebo, on maintenance of clinical remission in adolescent subjects with active CD
- Characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) relationship of ozanimod
- Demonstrate the efficacy of ozanimod, compared to placebo, on health care resource utilization (HRU), subject-reported outcomes, and quality of life
- Demonstrate the safety and tolerability of ozanimod as maintenance therapy;Primary end point(s): - Proportion of subjects with a CDAI score of < 150 at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SESCD) decrease from baseline of = 50% at Week 52;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: - The first primary endpoint is CDAI clinical remission at Week 52. Subjects will be deemed responders with respect to this endpoint if they meet the definition, CDAI score of < 150 at Week 52.
- The second primary endpoint is endoscopic response (50%) at Week 52. Subjects will be deemed responders with respect to this endpoint if they meet the definition, SES-CD decrease from baseline of = 50% at Week 52.

Secundary end point (Data source: WHO)

Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: at Week 52;Secondary end point(s): Major Secondary Endpoints:
-Proportion of subjects with CDAI reduction from baseline of = 100
points or CDAI score of < 150 at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with average daily abdominal pain score = 1
point and average daily stool frequency = 3 points with abdominal pain
and stool frequency no worse than baseline at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with a CDAI score < 150 at Week 52, while
remaining corticosteroid free in the prior 12 weeks
- Proportion of subjects with a CDAI score of < 150 at Week 52 in
subjects with a CDAI score < 150 at pre-randomization
- Proportion of subjects with a CDAI score of < 150 at Week 52 and at =80% of visits between Week 8 and Week 52, inclusive, in subjects with a CDAI score < 150 at pre randomization
- Proportion of subjects with absence of ulcers = 0.5 cm with no segment with any ulcerated surface =10% at Week 52
- Histologic improvement based on differences between ozanimod and placebo in histologic disease activity scores (ie, Global Histologic Disease
Activity Score (GHAS) changes at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with average daily abdominal pain score = 1 point, and average daily stool frequency score = 3 points with abdominal
pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline AND an SES-CD decrease from baseline of = 50% at Week 52
Additional Secondary Endpoints:
- Proportion of subjects with CDAI score of < 150 and SES-CD decrease from baseline of = 50% at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with average daily abdominal pain score = 1 point, and average daily stool frequency score = 3 points with abdominal
pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline and an SES-CD = 4 points and a SES-CD decrease =2 points at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with CDAI reduction from baseline of = 100 points or CDAI score < 150 and SES-CD decrease from baseline of = 50% at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with CDAI score < 150 at Week 12 and SES-CD decrease from baseline of = 50% at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with CDAI reduction from baseline of = 70 points at Week 52
- Proportion of subjects with mucosal healing (SES-CD = 4 points and a SES-CD decrease = 2 points) and histologic improvement by GHAS or
Robarts Histologic Index (RHI) at Week 52
- Time to relapse (an increase in the CDAI score from Maintenance Day 1 of = 100 points and a CDAI score > 220, SES-CD score = 6 [or = 4 if isolated ileal disease]), and exclusion of other causes of an increase in disease activity unrelated to underlying CD (eg, infections, change in medication)
- Proportion of subjects with a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) decrease from baseline of = 50% at Week 52
Additional Secondary Endpoints (Adolescent Subjects):
- Proportion of adolescent subjects with Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) = 10 points at Week 52
- Proportion of adolescent subjects with decrease from baseline in PCDAI score =15 points at Week 52

Contact information (Data source: WHO)

Celgene International II Sàrl

Trial results (Data source: WHO)

Results summary

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Oral Ozanimod as Maintenance Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease

Link to the results in the primary register

no information available yet

Information on the availability of individual participant data

no information available yet

Trial sites

Trial sites in Switzerland (Data source: BASEC)

Bern, St. Gallen, Zurich

Countries (Data source: WHO)

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Republic of, Republic of, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Contact for further information on the trial

Details of contact in Switzerland (Data source: BASEC)

Martin Winiger, Bristol-Myers Squibb SA
+41 41 767 72 26
martin.winiger@bms.com

Contact for general information (Data source: WHO)

Denesh Chitkara
Rue du Pré-Jorat 14
Celgene International II Sàrl
+1908897 5751
Denesh.Chitkara@bms.com

Contact for scientific information (Data source: WHO)

Denesh Chitkara
Rue du Pré-Jorat 14
Celgene International II Sàrl
+1908897 5751
Denesh.Chitkara@bms.com

Principal Sponsor/Investigator

Principal sponsor (Data source: WHO)

Celgene International II Sàrl

Authorisation by the ethics committee (Data source: BASEC)

Name of the authorising ethics committee (for multicentre studies only the lead committee)

Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern

Date of authorisation by the ethics committee

19.03.2019

Further trial identification numbers

Trial identification number of the ethics committee (BASEC-ID) (Data source: BASEC)

2018-01619

Secondary ID (Data source: WHO)

RPC01-3203
2017-004294-14-HU